Have Your Say: help shape the future of the Statelessness Index
Since its launch in 2018, the Statelessness Index has become a vital tool for monitoring how European countries protect stateless people, and track the measures being taken to prevent and reduce statelessness. With data from 34 countries, the Index has evolved significantly as a comparative tool that informs research, advocacy, and policy efforts to end statelessness in Europe.
In order to ensure the continued effectiveness, sustainability and relevance of the Index, we want to make sure that we’re investing capacity where it’s most needed. We have therefore launched an online survey to find out more about our Index users. We want to hear from you regardless of whether you use the Index regularly, have been part of its development, or have accessed it just a couple of times. Your feedback will help us shape the future of the Statelessness Index!
>>> Take the survey <<<
Malta acceded to the 1954 Convention in 2019, but still provides very limited protection for stateless people, and is not party to the 1961 Convention. Malta has no mechanism to identify and determine statelessness, and no statelessness protection status, although it has other routes through which some stateless people may regularise their stay, including temporary humanitarian protection. Data on the stateless population is therefore limited, with figures available only for the very small number of asylum-seekers, international protection beneficiaries, or refused asylum-seekers recorded as ‘nationality unknown’ who cannot be returned and may or may not be stateless. Maltese law provides some protections against arbitrary detention, but there are limited procedural guarantees and safeguards. Rights afforded to those detained for removal purposes are very limited. Restrictions on access to detention centres limit the possibility for NGOs and other actors to identify stateless people.
There are some safeguards in Maltese law to prevent statelessness, but implementation is problematic and there are some key gaps. The law attempts to prevent statelessness in cases of adopted children and new-born foundlings whose parents remain unidentified. There is a provision granting children born stateless on the territory a conditional right to acquire nationality following five years’ legal residence, but, although in line with the 1961 Convention, the provision does not prevent statelessness in all cases and is not currently implemented in practice. Maltese law was amended to remove discriminatory provisions relating to conferral of nationality by descent following a European Court of Human Rights judgment ruling against Malta on this matter in 2011. Malta has only partial safeguards to prevent statelessness as a consequence of provisions for deprivation of nationality.
Neil Falzon, aditus foundation
დამატებითი წყაროები
შეფასების კრიტერიუმი
დამატებითი ინფორმაცია






